lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateFri, 6 Feb 2004 11:27:09 -0600
FromTroy Benjegerdes <>
SubjectRe: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 08:42:14AM -0800, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2004 at 05:11:00PM -0800, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 02:26:46PM -0800, Hefty, Sean wrote:
> >> Personally, I'm amazed that professional developers have to discuss
> or
> >> defend modular, portable code.
> >
> >You're new to linux-kernel, aren't you? ;)
> 
> I was not trying to be condescending.  My point was that I think that
> everyone on this list knows the purpose and benefits behind an
> abstraction layer.  It's not something that needed to be discussed any
> further.

I attempting to make a (poor) joke on the contiual flamewars that happen
on open-source development projects. 

I think someone's said something like this before, but..

"Nothing useful ever gets done on linux-kernel without a good flamewar"

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.768 / U:0.070 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans