![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 22:06:42 -0600 Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org> wrote: > It does look like 2.6 does better, but I don't have quite the > amount of memory on my laptop.... I see the problem on a 8GB x86-64 box with 2.6.2-rc1. After a find / I have: Active / Total Objects (% used) : 1794827 / 1804510 (99.5%) Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 125647 / 125647 (100.0%) Active / Total Caches (% used) : 71 / 112 (63.4%) Active / Total Size (% used) : 685008.27K / 686856.36K (99.7%) Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.38K / 128.00K OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME 708600 708559 99% 0.25K 47240 15 188960K dentry_cache 624734 624128 99% 0.69K 56794 11 454352K reiser_inode_cache 254200 253514 99% 0.09K 6355 40 25420K buffer_head 109327 109253 99% 0.06K 1853 59 7412K size-64 Now I allocate 6GB of RAM. After that: Active / Total Objects (% used) : 741266 / 1092573 (67.8%) Active / Total Slabs (% used) : 78291 / 78291 (100.0%) Active / Total Caches (% used) : 71 / 112 (63.4%) Active / Total Size (% used) : 339837.24K / 455189.93K (74.7%) Minimum / Average / Maximum Object : 0.02K / 0.42K / 128.00K OBJS ACTIVE USE OBJ SIZE SLABS OBJ/SLAB CACHE SIZE NAME 464497 381126 82% 0.69K 42227 11 337816K reiser_inode_cache 391545 192481 49% 0.25K 26103 15 104412K dentry_cache 135840 95304 70% 0.09K 3396 40 13584K buffer_head 1GB of dentry cache seems to be quite excessive. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||