lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?

On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 03:32:09PM -0500, Tillier, Fabian wrote:
> So which is more important to the "Linux kernel" project: i386 backwards
> compatibility, or consistent API and functionality across processor
> architectures? ;)

Anyway, why not describe what you are trying to accomplish that made you
determine that you _had_ to have these kinds of functions.

Basically, what is lacking in the current kernel locks that the
infiniband project has to have in order to work properly. We can work
from there.

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.044 / U:0.724 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site