Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Feb 2004 01:39:44 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: kgdb support in vanilla 2.6.2 |
| |
Hi!
> >I wouldn't support inclusion of i386 kgdb until it has had a lot of > >cleanup, possible de-featuritisification and some thought has been applied > >to splitting it into arch and generic bits. It's quite a lot of work. > > Amit has started at least the third activity--he has split much of kgdb > into arch and generic bits. > > Could you elaborate a little on the first two? > > What major kinds of cleanup are we talking about? Style issues? > > What features (or classes of features) do you find excessive? Would > it be sufficient to add a few config items to control subfeatures > of kgdb? > > These are not idle questions. If the amount of work to get it ready > for acceptance is tractable, I know a company that may be willing to > pay to have the work done.
Well, I guess I know two more such companies. Seems like everyone and their aunt want kgdb these days :-). Pavel
-- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |