Messages in this thread | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | Subject | Re: Dropping CONFIG_PM_DISK? | Date | Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:32:21 +0100 |
| |
Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:
> Hi! > >> > Would there be any major screaming if I tried to drop CONFIG_PM_DISK? >> > It seems noone is maintaining it, equivalent functionality is provided >> > by swsusp, and it is confusing users... >> >> It may be ugly, it may be unmaintained, but I get the impression that it >> works for some people for whom swsusp doesn't. So unless swsusp works for >> everyone or Nigel's swsusp2 is merged, I'd suggest leaving that in. > > Do you have example when pmdisk works and swsusp does not? I'm not > aware of any in recent history...
For me, none of them (pmdisk, swsusp and swsusp2) work. I did manage to get pmdisk to resume once, and swsusp2 makes it half-way through the resume. The old swsusp doesn't even get that far.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |