![]() | ||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004 22:15, Nick Piggin wrote: > Con Kolivas wrote: > >Hi Nick > > > >>So it is more a matter of tuning than anything fundamental > > > >Geez I know how you feel... :-D > > > > > >I tried it on the X440 with sched smt disabled > > > >better than before but still slower than vanilla on half load; however > > better than vanilla on optimal and full load now! I wonder whether the > > worse result on half load is as relevant since this is 8x HT cpus? > > Thanks. Yep the drop off at half load is to be expected with > CONFIG_SCHED_SMT turned off. Will this affect the SCHED_SMT performance and should I do a round of benchies with this enabled? Con - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | |||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | ||||||||||