![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:39:24 +0100 Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de> wrote: > you're wrong about s/vm_next/rb_next()/, walking the tree like in > get_unmapped_area would require recurisve algos w/o vm_next, or > significant heap allocations. that's the only thing vm_next is needed > for (i.e. to walk the tree in order efficiently). only if we drop all > tree walks than we can nuke vm_next. Not sure what you mean here. rb_next() is not recursive. -Andi - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||