lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
FromIngo Oeser <>
SubjectRe: Why no interrupt priorities?
DateFri, 27 Feb 2004 12:27:32 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 27 February 2004 08:14, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> The point I tried to make was that it would INCREASE latency. Unless you
> have misdesigned device drivers, which is something that is fixable :)

Not if you bought them as IP from some company. Or you did some
outsourcing and external development games.

Then you are basically lost and must workaround your problems instead of
fixing them.

Regards

Ingo Oeser

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAPymkU56oYWuOrkARAsWUAKCTI3ikuVsV2xfFWS/frDBYCOJetACggQfr
NQcCvIS5I8jH4zWCPL5obYA=
=CoLz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2008