[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add getdents32t syscall

On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > In other words, why doesn't glibc ever just make a new major number and
> > make its "struct dirent" be the 64-bit version?
> You can't be serious. Can you even imagine the pain this would cause?

Do you know how much pain it causes when you make changes and you do _not_
change the major number?

At some point you need to clean up.

This issue has been with us for years and years. I don't understand why
you'd want to add a totally new system call now. Instead, I'd suggest you
just put this on the long list of things to fix for when a new major
number is to be used.

And yes, you should use a new major number at some point. It is
_senseless_ to never update the majors. Just make a clean break, go
through every little nagging ugly thing (and there are a _lot_ of them
that have accumulated over the years), and make ready for "libc-3.0".

No, I'm not suggesting you do it for this one thing, obviously. But
there's bound to be _thousands_ of these stupid things where glibc has
compatibility crap that makes no sense.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.056 / U:7.340 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site