![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Thu, Feb 26, 2004 at 05:36:34PM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote: > Is the assumption that hardirq handlers are superfast also the reason > why Linux calls all handlers on a shared interrupt, even if the first > handler reports it was for its device? I guess so; and in addition it may avoid future irq's in a NAPI like way :) Or it's just plain dead silly :) [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [W:0.231 / U:0.000 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||