[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: raid 5 with >= 5 members broken on x86
On Feb 26, 2004, Linus Torvalds <> wrote:

> Ok. I did the silly one-liner, but if the "don't care" approach really
> improves code generation, feel free to send one that fixes both the P5 and
> PII cases..

FWIW, I think the silly one-liner is actually an improvement, since
then we use a hardware register for the counter, instead of a stack
location. I was concerned about not increasing the register pressure
with the patch; it looked very tight already, and I couldn't tell it
wouldn't be exceeded with some older compiler that failed to eliminate
the frame pointer, for example.

If that's the way to go, I'll post a patch that leaves the +r alone.
If using a stack location for the counter could possibly be as
efficient as using a register, I'd convert "+r" (lines) to "+g". Any

Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see
Happy GNU Year! oliva@{,}
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva@{,}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.052 / U:17.672 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site