lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 2.6.3-mm3
Nick Piggin wrote:
>
>
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>
>>
>> So, you think vm-shrink-slab-lowmem.patch shrinks slab too much, or
>> Andrew's patch (IIRC, those comments were for Andrew's patch...)?
>>
>
> Mine does.
>

Won't Andrew's patch scan/shrink the slab more if there is more highmem
than lowmem?

>>
>> Hmm, do you think I'd get more slab shrinking with 2.6.3 +
>> zone-balancing-fix.patch?
>>
>
>
> Not really because you shouldn't be hitting the direct reclaim
> path. shrink_slab-for-all-zones.patch will help more though.

Sorry, I meant "shrink slab more than 2.6.3 with 2.6.3 +
zone-balancing-fix.patch".

Since the zones are more balanced, there should be more lowmem scanning
going on...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.091 / U:0.504 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site