Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:08:57 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: 2.6.3-mm3 |
| |
Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Mike Fedyk wrote: > >> >> So, you think vm-shrink-slab-lowmem.patch shrinks slab too much, or >> Andrew's patch (IIRC, those comments were for Andrew's patch...)? >> > > Mine does. >
Won't Andrew's patch scan/shrink the slab more if there is more highmem than lowmem?
>> >> Hmm, do you think I'd get more slab shrinking with 2.6.3 + >> zone-balancing-fix.patch? >> > > > Not really because you shouldn't be hitting the direct reclaim > path. shrink_slab-for-all-zones.patch will help more though.
Sorry, I meant "shrink slab more than 2.6.3 with 2.6.3 + zone-balancing-fix.patch".
Since the zones are more balanced, there should be more lowmem scanning going on... - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |