[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [25]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: 2.6.3-mm3

Mike Fedyk wrote:

>>> What about Nick's fix up patch for the two patches above? Should I
>>> include that one also?
> I'm running 2.6.3-mm3-486-fazok (nick's patch), and it has improved my
> slab usage greatly. It was averaging 500MB-700MB slab. Now slab is
> ~230MB, and page cache is ~700MB

That is a much better sounding ratio. Of course that doesn't mean much
if performance is worse. Slab might be getting reclaimed a little bit
too hard vs pagecache now.

> See:
> Is there any way I can get the VM patches against 2.6.3? I'm not
> comfortable with running -mm3 on this production server, especially
> seeing the "sync hang" bug.

Well your server wasn't going too badly with 2.6.3, wasn't it? Might
as well just wait for them to get into the the tree.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.103 / U:2.208 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site