![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Mike Strosaker <strosake@austin.ibm.com> wrote: > > There are some ppc64-specific actions that should be taken upon a > kernel panic. Rather than adding a new #ifdef in panic(), it seems to > me that it would be worthwhile to add a single callout, and move the > arch-specific code out to the arch subtrees. Does this seem reasonable, > or should another #ifdef be added in panic() to perform the ppc64- > specific actions? We have the panic_notifier_list in there. Cannot you hook into that? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||