[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: GFS requirements (was: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range)
On 2004-02-21T14:09:13,
Daniel Phillips <> said:

> But the one true clustering infrastructure hasn't been developed yet.


> from being able to define that sensibly now. It's better to implement
> exactly what a given DFS needs for the time being.


> > So, how does OpenGFS/GFS achieve the communication? How does it
> > interact with the infrastructure (which, I infere from your above
> > comments, is meant to reside in user-space)?
> It's done both ways, actually. No new kernel hooks are used in either
> case.

That doesn't answer my question how you are doing the user-space /
kernel communication ;-)

And will the user-space infrastructure to go with GFS be open source
too? Questions over questions.

Lars Marowsky-Brée <>

High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.083 / U:7.100 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site