lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]   [less markup]   [headers]   [forward]  
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateSun, 22 Feb 2004 10:30:36 +0000
FromChristoph Hellwig <>
SubjectRe: i2c-yosemite
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> If everyone reimplements what already exists, the kernel is likely to go
> bigger with no benefit. Also, you won't be able to use all user-space
> tools that already exist, and will also have to write specific chip
> drivers for the chips present on the yosemite bus, although these
> drivers (Atmel 24C32 EEPROM and MAX 1619) already exist.
> 
> Please explain to us why you cannot/don't want to use the existing i2c
> subsystem.

Yupp.  While we're at it what should we do with the i2c reimplementations
in alsa and dvb?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [W:0.499 / U:0.040 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans