lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: i2c-yosemite
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote:
> If everyone reimplements what already exists, the kernel is likely to go
> bigger with no benefit. Also, you won't be able to use all user-space
> tools that already exist, and will also have to write specific chip
> drivers for the chips present on the yosemite bus, although these
> drivers (Atmel 24C32 EEPROM and MAX 1619) already exist.
>
> Please explain to us why you cannot/don't want to use the existing i2c
> subsystem.

Yupp. While we're at it what should we do with the i2c reimplementations
in alsa and dvb?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans