Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 10:30:36 +0000 | | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | | Subject | Re: i2c-yosemite |
| |
On Sun, Feb 22, 2004 at 10:41:06AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > If everyone reimplements what already exists, the kernel is likely to go > bigger with no benefit. Also, you won't be able to use all user-space > tools that already exist, and will also have to write specific chip > drivers for the chips present on the yosemite bus, although these > drivers (Atmel 24C32 EEPROM and MAX 1619) already exist. > > Please explain to us why you cannot/don't want to use the existing i2c > subsystem.
Yupp. While we're at it what should we do with the i2c reimplementations in alsa and dvb?
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |