[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
Ed Tomlinson wrote:

> On February 21, 2004 10:28 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
>>>Maybe gradual page-cache pressure could shirnk the slab?
>>What happened to the experiment of having slab pages on the (in)active
>>lists and letting them be free'd that way? Didn't somebody already do
>>that? Ed Tomlinson and Craig Kulesa?
> You have a good memory.
> We dropped this experiment since there was a lot of latency between the time a
> slab page became freeable and when it was actually freed. The current
> call back scheme was designed to balance slab preasure and vmscaning.

Does it really matter if there is a lot of latency? How does this
affect real-world results? IOW, if it's not at the end of the LRU, then
there's probably something better to free instead...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.099 / U:17.308 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site