[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
    Ed Tomlinson wrote:

    > On February 21, 2004 10:28 pm, Linus Torvalds wrote:
    >>On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Chris Wedgwood wrote:
    >>>Maybe gradual page-cache pressure could shirnk the slab?
    >>What happened to the experiment of having slab pages on the (in)active
    >>lists and letting them be free'd that way? Didn't somebody already do
    >>that? Ed Tomlinson and Craig Kulesa?
    > You have a good memory.
    > We dropped this experiment since there was a lot of latency between the time a
    > slab page became freeable and when it was actually freed. The current
    > call back scheme was designed to balance slab preasure and vmscaning.

    Does it really matter if there is a lot of latency? How does this
    affect real-world results? IOW, if it's not at the end of the LRU, then
    there's probably something better to free instead...

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.062 / U:70.176 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site