lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Large slab cache in 2.6.1
Nick Piggin wrote:

>
>
> Mike Fedyk wrote:
>> I'll have to test the kernel on two other machines for a few days
>> before I put it on this particular machine. Unfortunately, both of
>> them have < 1.5GB ram.
>>
>
> That is quite alright. I didn't intend to sound pushy in that
> message, and I fully understand if you refuse to test patches on
> your production machine.

No problem. It is really sad when a problem could be fixed if only the
origional reporter put more effort into testing the proposed fixes.

Heh, so let me keep from being one of those reporters...

>
>> So let me know which patches are most likely to fix this problem.
>>
>> PS, if I can apply them to my 2.6.1 kernel, then I wouldn't have to
>> run the base kernel to compare changes of 2.6.1 -> 2.6.3 -> 2.6.3-mm
>> -> your patch.
>>
>> Each step would require a week-day to get a fair compairison.
>>
>
> The last patch I posted would be a good one to test if you possibly
> can. You should hear someone shout within a few days if it does
> anything nasty, so the 2.6.3-mm+patch path is probably safer ;)
>

Ok, I'll get started compiling tonight. Be sure to CC me if you have
any updates to this patch.

Mike

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:1.150 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site