Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 23:03:00 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Linux 2.4.25-rc4 |
| |
Hi!
> > > Your fix looks ok. I dont think calling acpi_system_save_state(S5) can > > > cause any breakage. Len? > > > > I bet it will create "machine will reboot instead of poweroff" on some > > strange machine.... Perhaps it fixes more machines than it breaks, but > > it will probably break some. > > This is interesting. Do you have an idea about what could break > exactly ?
No, but this is ACPI. No matter how simple change looks, it will break something.
> In my case, I have noticed two things : > - if I disable local APIC, the standard code works > - if I enable local APIC, I need the patch above. > > So perhaps it would be enough to disable local APIC instead of calling this > function ?
Hmm.. that means we need APIC driver model... Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |