Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sun, 22 Feb 2004 12:53:12 -0800 | From | Paul Jackson <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Linux 2.6: shebang handling in fs/binfmt_script.c |
| |
> BTW, which shell expects the name of the script in argv[2]?
Which ones don't? The burden is on you, not me. The Bourne like shells that I happen to try just now _do_ display syntax error messages in shell scripts with the name of the shell script file in the error message. Look and see how they are getting that script file name.
What's theoretical on one persons machine is very real and painful on a million persons machines. Incompatible changes in documented interfaces have a high threshold to overcome.
-- I won't rest till it's the best ... Programmer, Linux Scalability Paul Jackson <pj@sgi.com> 1.650.933.1373 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |