Messages in this thread | | | From | Daniel Phillips <> | Subject | Re: GFS requirements (was: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range) | Date | Fri, 20 Feb 2004 22:16:09 -0500 |
| |
On Friday 20 February 2004 18:56, Lars Marowsky-Bree wrote: > Surely, such a GFS needs a cluster infrastructure - membership, > messaging, DLM - in the kernel. > > Can you or anyone else from Sistina/RHAT clarify on the details of > this?
Hi Lars,
I presume you meant "DFS". I can't comment on the details of the plan for GFS just now, however consider OpenGFS: yes, it needs and has a cluster infrastructure. The kernel does not dictate anything about that infrastructure. Each DFS is free to implement its own infrastructure, possibly involving kernel extensions.
Regards,
Regards
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |