Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:56:02 +0100 | From | Lars Marowsky-Bree <> | Subject | Re: GFS requirements (was: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range) |
| |
On 2004-02-20T17:16:02, Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> said:
I'm trimming the mm list, because this isn't relevant to them.
> Again, we (everybody who cared to jump in) now agree on what is sane > here, it's quite logical. As for supplying background material so > this makes sense to a wider group of people, sorry it's been on my > to-do list for a while. Getting a DFS, namely Sistina GFS, into the > tree is underway as you know from the press release, however turning > the ship takes time. Meanwhile, the api discussion can't wait because > the rudder on that ship is even smaller.
Surely, such a GFS needs a cluster infrastructure - membership, messaging, DLM - in the kernel.
Can you or anyone else from Sistina/RHAT clarify on the details of this?
Sincerely, Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>
-- High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter. SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better. Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |