lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: GFS requirements (was: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range)
On 2004-02-20T17:16:02,
Daniel Phillips <phillips@arcor.de> said:

I'm trimming the mm list, because this isn't relevant to them.

> Again, we (everybody who cared to jump in) now agree on what is sane
> here, it's quite logical. As for supplying background material so
> this makes sense to a wider group of people, sorry it's been on my
> to-do list for a while. Getting a DFS, namely Sistina GFS, into the
> tree is underway as you know from the press release, however turning
> the ship takes time. Meanwhile, the api discussion can't wait because
> the rudder on that ship is even smaller.

Surely, such a GFS needs a cluster infrastructure - membership,
messaging, DLM - in the kernel.

Can you or anyone else from Sistina/RHAT clarify on the details of
this?


Sincerely,
Lars Marowsky-Brée <lmb@suse.de>

--
High Availability & Clustering \ ever tried. ever failed. no matter.
SUSE Labs | try again. fail again. fail better.
Research & Development, SUSE LINUX AG \ -- Samuel Beckett

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.221 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site