lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: PROBLEM: spurious temporary freeze, scheduler and preempt problem ?
FromBrice Figureau <>
DateThu, 19 Feb 2004 10:41:32 +0100
Eric, Nick,

On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 01:27, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Eric wrote:
> 
> >On Wednesday 18 February 2004 9:26 am, Brice Figureau wrote:
> >Someone correct me if I'm way off base, but have you tried
> >	scheduler=deadline
> >To try the different kernel schedulers?
> >Im not sure about the keyword, but do a quick google or search lkml and you'll 
> >see the correct keyword and the different schedulers you can try.
>
> It's probably a CPU scheduler related problem, so this
> wouldn't do much.

Yes it is more a CPU scheduler problem, than an io one (although I
tested with elevator=deadline just to be sure ;-) and I had the same
problem).

--
Brice Figureau

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:01    [W:0.437 / U:0.020 seconds]
©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans