Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 19 Feb 2004 17:14:55 +0100 | From | Pavel Machek <> | Subject | Re: Reserved page flaging of 2.4 kernel memory changed recently? |
| |
Hi!
> >>I actually would like to rename the bit PG_nosave to PG_donttouch ;) > > to make a point with regard to: > > no transfer of page contents during suspend/resume > no netdump > no debugger access without override > > ... but the name does not matter and we do not have to change it. > > >Its used for swsusp internal data, too... > > Yes of course - how else would swsusp run, but these data are also not > "touched" > during suspend and resume wrt transfer of page content.
Yes. But I still want to be able to access swsusp internal data through debugger, and I want them in the netdump.
That means that PG_nosave | PG_reserved indeed is "PG_donttouch", but PG_nosave has slightly different meaning. Pavel -- When do you have a heart between your knees? [Johanka's followup: and *two* hearts?] - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |