[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: Non-GPL export of invalidate_mmap_range
Christoph Hellwig <> wrote:
> Yes. Andrew, please read the GPL, it's very clear about derived works.
> Then please tell me why you think gpfs is not a derived work.

I haven't seen the code.

> > But at the end of the day, if we decide to not export this symbol, we owe
> > Paul a good, solid reason, yes?
> Yes. We've traditionally not exported symbols unless we had an intree user,
> and especially not if it's for a module that's not GPL licensed.

That's certainly a good rule of thumb and we (and I) have used it before.

What is the reasoning behind it?
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.189 / U:9.440 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site