Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:13:44 -0700 | From | Tom Rini <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH][6/6] A different KGDB stub |
| |
On Wed, Feb 18, 2004 at 12:08:55AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > > > > The following is the x86_64-specific bits to this KGDB stub (Pavel, can > > > > you give this a try please? Thanks). > > > > > > I can only see [0/6],[1/6] and [6/6] on l-k. Could you perhaps mail me > > > complete diff against 2.6.2 to try? [Or against some other version I > > > can get from kernel.org...) > > > > I'll blame the slow mailserver and hope they all get through > > eventually. > > Yes, now only #2 is missing :-))). > > > The following is the patch before I split it up. Against 2.6.3-rc4 + > > bk-netdev from 2.6.3-rc3-mm1 (otherwise kgdboe won't work at all): > > I'll try without kgdboe, first. > > I'm getting some compile errors, stay tuned.
I'm not surprised, sadly.
> Meanwhile: [and taking this public] > > arch/x86_64/kernel/x86_64-stub.c: this is really horrible name for a > file. Can we have arch/x86_64/kernel/kgdb.c? or kgdb-stub.c at worst.. > > also kernel/kgdb.c sounds better than kernel/kgdbstub.c.
Don't look at me for naming, when in doubt I call stuff 'simple' (see arch/ppc/boot/simple, or CONFIG_PPC_SIMPLE_SERIAL, and I'm sure I'll do it again). If people like kernel/kgdb.c (and arch/$(ARCH)/kernel/kgdb.c or kgdb-stub.c) that's fine with me, so long as they're all consistent.
-- Tom Rini http://gate.crashing.org/~trini/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |