[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [17]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: UTF-8 practically vs. theoretically in the VFS API (was: Re: JFS default behavior)
    On Tue, 17 Feb 2004, Linus Torvalds wrote:

    > In short: even if you hate Unicode with a passion, and refuse to touch it
    > and think standards are worthless, you should still use the same
    > transformation that UTF-8 does to your idiotic character set of the day.
    > Because the _transform_ makes sense regardless of character set encoding.

    Pretty much every charset other than Unicode does not NEED encoding
    because it was already designed to work with existing system. The decision
    to make the basic representation of charset full of zero bytes was the
    reason that created the need for UTF-8. People who use other charsets may
    not have planned for multilingual environments like they should've done,
    but they aren't stupid enough to require someone to "bless" them with a
    variable-length encoding.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:01    [W:0.039 / U:5.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site