Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:42:44 +1100 | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [2.6.2] Badness in futex_wait revisited |
| |
On Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:13:35 -0800 Dirk Morris <dmorris@metavize.com> wrote:
> In reference to this previous post: > http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0401.1/1966.html > > I also get: > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: Call Trace: > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c01387e1>] futex_wait+0x191/0x1a0 > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c011e9e0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c011e9e0>] default_wake_function+0x0/0x20 > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c0138abb>] do_futex+0x6b/0x80 > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c0138be6>] sys_futex+0x116/0x130 > Feb 13 11:43:52 timmy kernel: [<c010959f>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb > > I get this in 2.6.1 and 2.6.2. > In userland a call to sem_wait returns with -1, and errno = -EINTR
Yes...
Please send your config. What's happening at the time?
(Andrew's patch was buggy, I fixed it and can send you an update).
Rusty. -- there are those who do and those who hang on and you don't see too many doers quoting their contemporaries. -- Larry McVoy - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |