lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [16]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [BENCHMARK] 2.6.3-rc2 v 2.6.3-rc3-mm1 kernbench


Con Kolivas wrote:

>-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Here's some nice evidence of the sched domains' patch value:
>kernbench 0.20 running on an X440 8x1.5Ghz P4HT (2 node)
>
>Time is in seconds. Lower is better (fixed font table)
>
>Summary:
>Kernel: 2.6.3-rc2 2.6.3-rc3-mm1
>Half(-j8) 120.8 113.0
>Optimal(-j64) 81.6 79.3
>Max(-j) 82.9 80.3
>
>
>shorter summary:
>2.6.3-rc3-mm1 kicks butt
>
>

Thanks Con,
Results look pretty good. The half-load context switches are
increased - that is probably a result of active balancing.
And speaking of active balancing, it is not yet working across
nodes with the configuration you're on.

To get some idea of our worst case SMT performance (-j8), would
it be possible to do -j8 and -j64 runs with HT turned off?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.060 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site