![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 05:46:15PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > I wonder if changing timeout in atkbd_sendbyte to 400 or 500 ms will > > > cure the problem.> > > > It probably would, but it also would slow down the detection. I think we > > can simply ignore bytes with the timeout flag set in the atkbd_interrupt > > function when we're not expecting an ACK/NAK.> > > > The problem with this approach is that if late NAK comes while we are > actually waiting for result of some other command it will interfere and > can cause misdetection. This only happens with timeout NAKs. And in that case, there is no device to talk to - and thus nothing can be misdetected. -- Vojtech Pavlik SuSE Labs, SuSE CR - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||