![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 12:09:01 -0800 Michael Hayes <mike@aiinc.ca> wrote:
> | Relax, this is not a spelling patch.> |> | I was curious how fast spelling errors flow into the kernel, so I
> | looked at the + lines in the 2.6.2 patch. A few of the errors
> | already existed, but most of them are new. It turns out that there
> | are around 200 new spelling errors in 2.6.2.> |> | A "wether" (castrated goat) has appeared, along with a "Rusell" that
> | should be stamped out before it spreads. Someone had a dreadful time
> | with "technology" and its variants, spelling it wrong 9 different ways.
> |
> | Here's what I found:
> |
> | File Error Should be #
> | -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Amazing (to me). It's a good thing that we have a compiler to
Indeed.
> check the non-comments, otherwise it might never boot.
Where's the compiler for the spelling? ;-)
cpp -spell
gcc -spell
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||