![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Bongani Hlope <bonganilinux@mweb.co.za> writes: > There is nothing wrong with that patch, the problem with Highmem support > on x86 is that is uses an Intel hack to address the full 1Gb of memory, > which make memory access a bit slower. The question is, does the 128Mb > additional memory worth that penalty? 2GB/2GB split doesn't use any Intel hack nor highmem. In fact for 1 GB of RAM I use a little different split which covers the whole RAM and gives more virtual RAM, something like 1.2/2.8 GB. -- Krzysztof Halasa, B*FH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||