lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateWed, 11 Feb 2004 18:00:19 -0800
FromDave Olien <>
SubjectRe: ext2/3 performance regression in 2.6 vs 2.4 for small interleaved writes
2.4 does not have deadline scheduler.  But the 2.6 deadline scheduler
is more similar to 2.4's scheduler than is the anticipatory scheduler.

Re-try 2.6 with deadline scheduler will remove some of the additional
scheduler policies that are present in the anticipatory scheduler.

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 10:18:06PM +0100, Diego Calleja wrote:
> El Thu, 12 Feb 2004 05:02:39 +0800 Michael Frank <mhf@linuxmail.org> escribió:
> 
> 
> > 2.4 has a deadline scheduler. 2.6 default is anticipatory.
> 
> I though the 2.4 io scheduler wasn't "deadline" base, I think the first
> "deadline" io scheduler was the one merged ~2.5.39
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2008