lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: printk and long long
Date
hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) writes:

> Followup to: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402111655170.17933-100000@gaia.cela.pl>
> By author: Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@cela.pl>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, vda wrote:
>>
>> > The character L specifying that a following e, E, f, g, or G
>> > conversion corresponds to a long double argument, or a following
>> > d, i, o, u, x, or X conversion corresponds to a long long argument.
>> > Note that long long is not specified in ANSI C and therefore
>> > not portable to all architectures.
>>
>> [ personally I'd say screw the un-portable architectures ;) ]
>> Long long is here to stay.
>
> long long is C99, so it's *definitely* here to say. The conversion specifier
> is "ll" not "L", however.

What is the proper way to deal with printing an int64_t when int64_t
can be either long or long long depending on machine?

--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site