[lkml]   [2004]   [Feb]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: About highmem in 2.6
    Dave McCracken wrote:
    > --On Wednesday, February 11, 2004 18:47:04 +0100 Luis Miguel García
    > <> wrote:
    >>When I first installed 2.4, someone told me that if I had 1 gb ram it was
    >>better to not use highmem because those extra aditional mb was not worth
    >>the speed penalty of using the feature.
    >>Sorry for my ignorance (and my sucking english) but must I enable highmem
    >>now with 2.6? or have it any speed penalty althought?
    > I don't know if anyone has actually measured the relative performance, but
    > I'd expect the answer to be the same as 2.4. There is a small but
    > measurable performance penalty for enabling highmem which is higher than
    > the benefit of the extra 128 meg of memory you get when you have 1G. If
    > you have more than 1G it's better to enable highmem.

    I've been using this patch for a while now on my box (with 1GB):
    (kernel is 'vanilla' otherwise)

    This allows you to use your full 1GB w/out highmem support.... (2G/2G
    user/kernel addr space split, or something..)

    Anything (potentially) wrong/bad about this patch??

    Is there a simmilar patch for 2.6??


    pls. CC in reply, I'm not on the list....
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:00    [W:0.020 / U:1.608 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site