Messages in this thread |  | | | From | (Måns Rullgård) | | Subject | Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net? | | Date | Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:30:37 +0100 |
| |
Sander <sander@humilis.net> writes:
> Larry McVoy wrote (ao): >> We're moving openlogging back to our offices and I'm experimenting >> with filesystems to see what gives the best performance for BK usage. >> Reiserfs looks pretty good and I'm wondering if anyone knows any >> reasons that we shouldn't use it for bkbits.net. Also, would it help >> if the journal was on a different disk? Most of the bkbits traffic is >> read so I doubt it. >> >> Please cc me, I'm not on the list. > > I've cc'ed the Reiserfs mailinglist. > > IME Reiserfs is a fast and stable fs. If you have the time to benchmark > ext3, reiserfs, jfs and xfs (and ..) with bk then you would know first > hand which fs is best for you. It might be worth the time.
If someone does any tests, I'd be interested to hear about the results.
-- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |