Messages in this thread | | | From | Nikita Danilov <> | Date | Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:18:33 +0300 | Subject | Re: reiserfs for bkbits.net? |
| |
Sander writes: > Larry McVoy wrote (ao): > > We're moving openlogging back to our offices and I'm experimenting > > with filesystems to see what gives the best performance for BK usage. > > Reiserfs looks pretty good and I'm wondering if anyone knows any > > reasons that we shouldn't use it for bkbits.net. Also, would it help > > if the journal was on a different disk? Most of the bkbits traffic is > > read so I doubt it. > > > > Please cc me, I'm not on the list. > > I've cc'ed the Reiserfs mailinglist. > > IME Reiserfs is a fast and stable fs. If you have the time to benchmark > ext3, reiserfs, jfs and xfs (and ..) with bk then you would know first > hand which fs is best for you. It might be worth the time.
I can add that concurrent bk clone of kernel repositories is very good file system stress tool that we are using while debugging reiser4.
> > With kind regards, Sander >
Nikita.
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |