![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Hi! > Standard Kernel on a 512 Cpu machine allocating 32GB with an increasing > number of threads (and thus increasing parallellism of page faults): > > Gb Rep Threads User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec > 32 3 1 1.416s 138.165s 139.050s 45073.831 45097.498 ... > Patched kernel: > > Gb Rep Threads User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec > 32 3 1 1.098s 138.544s 139.063s 45053.657 45057.920 ... > These number are roughly equal to what can be accomplished with the > page fault scalability patches. > > Kernel patches with both the page fault scalability patches and > prefaulting: > > Gb Rep Threads User System Wall flt/cpu/s fault/wsec > 32 10 1 4.103s 456.384s 460.046s 45541.992 45544.369 ... > > The fault rate doubles when both patches are applied. ... > We are getting into an almost linear scalability in the high end with > both patches and end up with a fault rate > 3 mio faults per second. Well, with both patches you also slow single-threaded case more than twice. What are the effects of this patch on UP system? Pavel -- People were complaining that M$ turns users into beta-testers... ...jr ghea gurz vagb qrirybcref, naq gurl frrz gb yvxr vg gung jnl! - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||