lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateTue, 07 Dec 2004 18:23:46 +0100
FromPatrick McHardy <>
SubjectRe: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9
Thomas Graf wrote:

>* Patrick McHardy <41B5E188.5050800@trash.net> 2004-12-07 17:59
>
>
>>That's also what I thought at first. But the problem is in
>>tcf_action_copy_stats, it assumes a->priv has the same layout as
>>struct tcf_act_hdr, which is not true for struct tcf_police. This
>>patch rearranges struct tcf_police to match tcf_act_hdr.
>>
>>
>
>Hehe, see my post a few minutes back. I came up with nearly the same
>solution ;-> The only difference to my patch is that I don't touch
>tcf_police if the action code isn't compiled.
>
>
Either one is fine with me, although I would prefer to see
the number of ifdefs in this area going down, not up :)

Regards
Patrick


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [from the cache]
©2003-2010