lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2
    On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Helge Hafting wrote:
    > Jens Axboe wrote:
    >
    > >On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Robert Love wrote:
    > >
    > >
    > >>
    > >> (1) separate the two values. we have a scheduling
    > >> priority (distributing the finite resource of
    > >> processor time) and an I/O priority (distributing
    > >> the finite resource of disk bandwidth).
    > >> (2) just have a single value.
    > >>
    > >>
    > >
    > >They are inherently seperate entities, I don't think mixing them up is a
    > >good idea. IO priorities also includes things like attempting to
    > >guarentee disk bandwidth, it isn't always just a 'nice' value.
    > >
    > >
    > Two separate entities is fine. Those who want just one
    > entity can use a "nice wrapper" that sets both
    > simultaneously.

    Did you happen to catch any info out of the crash?

    --
    Jens Axboe

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.021 / U:0.620 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site