lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2
On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Helge Hafting wrote:
> Jens Axboe wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 06 2004, Robert Love wrote:
> >
> >
> >>
> >> (1) separate the two values. we have a scheduling
> >> priority (distributing the finite resource of
> >> processor time) and an I/O priority (distributing
> >> the finite resource of disk bandwidth).
> >> (2) just have a single value.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >They are inherently seperate entities, I don't think mixing them up is a
> >good idea. IO priorities also includes things like attempting to
> >guarentee disk bandwidth, it isn't always just a 'nice' value.
> >
> >
> Two separate entities is fine. Those who want just one
> entity can use a "nice wrapper" that sets both
> simultaneously.

Did you happen to catch any info out of the crash?

--
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.107 / U:0.468 seconds]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site