lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2
Robert Love wrote:
>>The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is
>>that I am
>>concerned about breaking existing code.
>
>
> Nothing should break.
>
> If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the
> default. Not a big deal.
>
> This allows the default case to be the same as today.
>
> Robert Love

For reference, this was discussed last year:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106847268508985&w=2

--
Pádraig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.846 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site