Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Time sliced CFQ #2 | From | Robert Love <> | Date | Mon, 06 Dec 2004 11:42:18 -0500 |
| |
> The reason I proposed my ideas for tying the two values together is > that I am > concerned about breaking existing code.
Nothing should break.
If apps don't explicitly set their i/o priority, then they get the default. Not a big deal.
This allows the default case to be the same as today.
Robert Love
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |