Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Dec 2004 17:36:17 +0100 | From | Jan-Benedict Glaw <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 2.6.10 1/22] xfrm: Add direction information to xfrm_state |
| |
On Thu, 2004-12-30 11:16:49 -0500, Dave Dillow <dave@thedillows.org> wrote in message <1104423409.23254.9.camel@dillow.idleaire.com>: > On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 04:48, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote: > > On Thu, 2004-12-30 03:48:34 -0500, David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org> > > wrote in message <20041230035000.10@ori.thedillows.org>: > > > +enum { > > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_UNKNOWN, > > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_IN, > > > + XFRM_STATE_DIR_OUT, > > > +}; > > > > Any specific reason to first define such a nice enum and then using int > > in the struct? > > Just following the current style in net/xfrm.h, see xfrm_state.km.state > and XFRM_STATE_*.
Hmmm... Maybe I'd prepare patches then :)
MfG, JBG
-- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@lug-owl.de . +49-172-7608481 _ O _ "Eine Freie Meinung in einem Freien Kopf | Gegen Zensur | Gegen Krieg _ _ O fuer einen Freien Staat voll Freier Bürger" | im Internet! | im Irak! O O O ret = do_actions((curr | FREE_SPEECH) & ~(NEW_COPYRIGHT_LAW | DRM | TCPA)); [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |