Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] let fat handle MS_SYNCHRONOUS flag | From | OGAWA Hirofumi <> | Date | Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:02:14 +0900 |
| |
Robert Hardy <rhardy@webcon.ca> writes:
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2004, Colin Leroy wrote: >> On 25 Nov 2004 at 22h11, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote: >>>> Thank you for your help. Do I push to Andrew? >>> I have some patches which conflict with this patch. So, I'll >>> submit the patches after fixing it. >> Ok. I suppose you'll handle the vfat one too? > > I am very interested in seeing this sync vfat patch committed. > > Can you please provide current status on vfat sync support? > > Also are there newer patches for the vfat support?
Currently, the many buffers is still not writing synchronously. And I'm rewriting the update-path for an update dependency and some optimization, now.
Current patches is here.
[I'm offline from today to January 2 or 3.]
Thanks. -- OGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
[unhandled content-type:application/octet-stream] | |