![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
>>>> Add -funit-at-a-time to the CFLAGS, and the compiler is happy. >>>> >>> But, does unit-at-a-time work reliably for all compilers on all archs back >>> to and including gcc 2.95.3 ? >> >>Unit-at-a-time is only available in GCC 3.4 and above. No, it's already in my 3.3.0 (SUSE Linux 8.2) and continues to exist in 3.3.3 (9.2) >The problem with unit-at-a-time isn't compiler availability, >but the fact that at least with gcc-3.4 on x86 it causes >significant stack usage increases, which in the kernel lead >to stack overflow problems. This is not a theoretical issue, >the overflows have been observed in normal kernels. > >So wrt inlining failures, the correct fix is to remove the >inlines or rearrange the code to allow inlining w/o unit-at-a-time. Or making some pressure on gcc developers to fix the increase. Jan Engelhardt -- ENOSPC - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:09 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||