lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [linux-usb-devel] Re: RFC: [2.6 patch] let BLK_DEV_UB depend on EMBEDDED
On Mon, Dec 20, 2004 at 10:28:05AM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
>
> > Its not that they just enable it. Its that it has side effects. I enable it to support
> > one device - it then 'devnaps' other devices that usbstorage supports _much_
> > better. Is there some way it could work in reverse. eg. let ub bind only if
> > usbstorage does not, possibly making usbstorage a _little_ more conservative
> > if ub is present?
>
> Unfortunately there isn't any way to define which driver should bind to a
> device, if they are both capable of controlling it. Maybe there should
> be. It might not be too hard to add a sysfs interface for that sort of
> thing.

We are working on it...

thanks,

greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08    [W:0.146 / U:0.080 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site