Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 17 Dec 2004 23:41:37 -0800 | | From | Matt Mackall <> | | Subject | Re: Issue on netconsole vs. Linux kernel oops |
| |
On Fri, Dec 17, 2004 at 10:01:34PM -0800, Park Lee wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 at 08:44, Matt Mackall wrote: > > > > Netconsole builds very simple IPv4 packets by hand > > without the use of the rest of the IP stack. This > > is how it continues to work when the system is > > crashing. So it will never be able to build IPSEC > > packets. > > Nor is it likely to do IPv6 any time soon. > > > > You can probably get it to work by using a > > different IP address for netconsole than you use > > for IPSEC, and set up the receiving end to > > recognize packets from that address as normal > > unencrypted IPv4. > > Thank you. > > But that will need at least 3 computers(i.e. 2 for > IPsec, 1 for receiving end), Am I right?
No, you should be able to configure a non-IPSsec interface on the receiver, possibly at a fourth address.
-- Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |