Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Re[2]: do_IRQ: stack overflow: 872.. | From | Bart De Schuymer <> | Date | Sat, 18 Dec 2004 17:46:20 +0100 |
| |
Op za, 18-12-2004 te 19:07 +0300, schreef Crazy AMD K7: > > Note to the original poster: when you report a bug with a patched > > kernel always mention it. > I have mentioned earlier and Bart knows it. > > I use 2.4.28 > + ebtables-brnf-8_vs_2.4.28.diff > + U32 patch from patch-o-matic-ng-20040621.tar.bz2 > + patch for br_netfilter.c made by Bart to find out why kernel panic happens(it was a few > letters ago) > All patches has applies cleanly. > U32 doesn't affect on br_netfilter.c
Sorry, I don't know the ip_queue mechanism and I don't know what could possibly go wrong. All we know is that you no longer have kernel panics with the simple patch I gave you (which just drops packets when a kernel panic would happen otherwise, and tells about this with a printk). However, you state there are no entries in your syslog that tell about this dropping. Is your syslog working right? Do you have a console open on which kernel messages get printed?
I still secretly suspect the snort code of inserting packets back into the kernel that don't have an output device (I don't know if that's possible, though).
cheers, Bart
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |