[lkml]   [2004]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch, 2.6.10-rc3] safe_hlt() & NMIs

On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> i ran the stresstest overnight with the 10 KHz NMI, and not a single
> time did the new branch trigger, out of hundreds of millions of IRQs and
> NMIs. I think this suggests that the race doesnt exist in current CPUs.

That may well be true, but I'm not convinced your test is meaningful or
shows anything.

The thing is, either the CPU is busy, or it's idle. If it's busy, you'll
never see this. And if it's idle, it will always be _in_ the "halt"

The only way to see the case is in the borderline cases, and if/when there
are multiple different interrupts (first non-NMI interrupt takes it out of
the hlt, and then the NMI happens to catch the sti). And quite frankly, I
don't see how you would stress-test it. A 1kHz timer interrupt with a
10kHz NMI interrupt is still very infrequent interrupts...

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2009-11-18 23:46    [W:0.122 / U:9.864 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site