![]() | |||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Andi Kleen wrote: > > I actually considered implementing it for x86-64 some time ago > for the modules, but then I never bothered. On AMD systems > I actually prefer to use small pages here. The reason is that > Opteron has a separated large and small pages TLB and the small > pages TLB is much bigger. When someone else uses huge TLB > pages too (user space or kernel direct mapping) then it's actually > a good idea to use small pages. Interesting... I actually use dual Opterons systems, with very large route cache hashes and tcp hashes. (rhash_entries=524288 thash_entries=524288), and a Hugetlb aware user space programs. x86info tells me (maybe wrongly) Family: 15 Model: 5 Stepping: 8 CPU Model : Opteron Instruction TLB: Fully associative. 32 entries. Data TLB: Fully associative. 32 entries. and /proc/cpuinfo tells me : model name : AMD Opteron(tm) Processor 248 TLB size : 1088 4K pages My questions are : 1) Are the route cache and tcp hashes use big pages (2MB) on 2.6.5/2.6.9 x86_64 kernels. 2) What are the exact number of data TLB entries (for small pages and huge ones) for opterons ? 3) All networks interrupts are handled by CPU0. Should we really use NUMA interleaved memory for hashes in this case ? Thank you Eric Dumazet - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 14:08 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||